View stories by State
HOME RSS FEEDS ARCHIVES ABOUT US SITE MAP PUBLICATIONS
Search using      Advanced
Saturday, November 21, 2009
or Browse All States
CRIME & COURTS
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
EDUCATION
ELECTIONS
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
GOVS' SPEECHES
HEALTH CARE
HOMELAND SECURITY
POLITICS
RECESSION & RECOVERY
SOCIAL POLICY
TAXES & BUDGET
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
ARCHIVES
COMMENTARY
PUBLICATIONS
RSS FEEDS
STATE SPEECHES
NEWS ALERTS
PUBLIC POLICY LINKS
TOOLBARS
STATE BLOGS
ISSUE BLOGS


Register to comment on Stateline.org Stories

Tuesday, October 02, 2001

Internet Sales Costing States Billions, Report Says

Comments Write the editor Print this story

State and local governments will lose $13.3 billion this year and tens of billions more in years to come because sales taxes are not paid on most Internet purchases, a report released Tuesday by the Institute for State Studies says.

The estimated losses are 41 percent higher than those predicted in an April 2000 study by the same researchers, a non-partisan, non-profit group affiliated with the Western Governors' online university. The difference between last year and now is largely the result of higher projections of business-to-business sales activity on the Internet.

Projected losses jump to $45.2 billion in 2006 and $54.8 billion in 2011, which is an amount greater than the entire budget of one of the nation's largest states, Florida.

The losses occur because states are not able to collect taxes on many Internet transactions, even though most of these transactions are taxable under current laws.

Tax collection efforts are hamstrung by a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that won't allow them to reach beyond state borders to grab tax dollars. Collection efforts are further complicated by the difficulty of sorting through the regulations of over 7,500 different state and local taxing jurisdictions, each with its own tax rates and definitions of taxable goods.

At a press conference introducing the report, Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt said there had been some question as to whether states were losing significant sums from uncollected sales taxes on Internet transactions. This study puts that question to rest, he said.

The loss of these dollars is a major issue for the 45 states that levy sales taxes and count on them for nearly half their revenue. The loss of tens of billions of dollars a year would curtail their ability to fund schools, healthcare and public safety.

The issue is viewed by some as a matter of fairness -- retail stores that have no Web presence fear losing business to online vendors who can hawk their wares without having to collect taxes.

"At the heart of this is an equity issue," Leavitt said. "The system we have currently creates inequities between retailers."

Critics point out that sales taxes on Internet purchases would further squelch an already struggling industry. They note also that shipping and handling surcharges on Internet purchases give brick-and-mortar businesses plenty of room to compete.

Leavitt said there are four things states can do to address the current sales tax system's problems:

  • Cut state programs and reduce services to account for lost revenue.

  • Turn to other taxes, such as income or property taxes, to make up for lost revenue.

  • Have the federal government create a national sales tax, which would involve a massive power shift to the federal government.

  • Fix the current system through legislative and technical means.

    Leavitt questioned whether sales taxes were even viable in the 21st Century, given the degree to which state and even national borders (and consequently taxing jurisdictions) have been made porous by the Internet.

    Although states are still a long way from overcoming their tax problems, efforts to fix the current system are underway. In August, the National Governors Association sent to Congress a letter signed by 42 governors asking for the freedom to design a system for the collection of sales taxes on Internet purchases. Also, three dozen states have begun to simplify and streamline their sales tax systems through legislation.

    The Internet sales tax study was commissioned by the Institute for State Studies and prepared by University of Tennessee researchers. Forrester Research, Inc. provided the data, which was drawn from an ongoing survey of the purchasing habits of 200,000 households and 13 different business-to-business supply chains.


  • Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org.

    COMMENTS (0)
    There are no comments yet, would you like to add one?
    Recession and Recovery
    Read the latest news, analysis and research on the economic crisis in the states in Stateline.org's new Recession and Recovery special section.
    The Stimulus and the StatesThe Stimulus and the
    States

    Follow how states are managing the stimulus money and which programs are receiving funding as part of the recovery effort using Stateline.org's stimulus special section.
    Stateline Blogs
    Stateline.org has compiled an extensive list of state issue political blogs to make it convenient for you to follow state government.

    If a blog you find interesting and informative is not on our list, tell us about it by sending an email to editor@stateline.org.
    Blogs organized by Issue
    lineBlogs organized by State
    State Public Policy Resources
    Stateline.org has put together a list of state public policy resources organized by issue. Here, you will find useful links to essential information from government, academia, and think tanks. If you have a link to add, please email us.


    The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew's Center on the States identifies and advances state policy solutions.