View stories by State
HOME RSS FEEDS ARCHIVES ABOUT US SITE MAP PUBLICATIONS
Search using      Advanced
Saturday, November 21, 2009
or Browse All States
CRIME & COURTS
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
EDUCATION
ELECTIONS
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
GOVS' SPEECHES
HEALTH CARE
HOMELAND SECURITY
POLITICS
RECESSION & RECOVERY
SOCIAL POLICY
TAXES & BUDGET
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
ARCHIVES
COMMENTARY
PUBLICATIONS
RSS FEEDS
STATE SPEECHES
NEWS ALERTS
PUBLIC POLICY LINKS
TOOLBARS
STATE BLOGS
ISSUE BLOGS


Register to comment on Stateline.org Stories

Monday, January 29, 2007

Food sales tax on states' chopping blocks

Comments Write the editor Print this story

While most Americans pay no state sales tax on groceries, shoppers in Mississippi and Tennessee fork over to state tax collectors the equivalent of more than three weeks’ worth of foodstuffs a year.
 
With coffers full this year, several of the 15 states that still tax groceries, including Mississippi and Tennessee, are considering scrapping their cut at the cash register on sales on bread, milk and other staples. Three states cut or eliminated their food taxes last year.
 
Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe, a Democrat, and Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle, a Republican, both want to dump the sales tax on food. “No one should be taxed for buying basic food necessities,” Lingle said in a statement when she unveiled a comprehensive tax package Jan. 18.
 
Lingle and Beebe both bank on budget surpluses to fill the holes their proposals would make in their state budgets. Lingle wants to eliminate Hawaii’s 4 percent sales tax on food.  In his State of the State address, Beebe called it a “moral charge” to eventually rid the state of the tax, starting with halving the current 6 percent rate.
 
“Most states would rather not tax groceries,” said Nick Johnson, director of the State Fiscal Project of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a group that tracks state policies that affect the poor. States that do tax food “are considered relics,” he said, but the tax can provide much-needed revenue.
 
Sales-tax exemptions generally apply to food purchased in grocery stores, not in restaurants. In addition to state sales taxes, some cities and localities also may tax food purchased in grocery stores and restaurants.
 
Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter (R) said that he would like to do away with the state’s 5 percent sales tax on groceries but that the state simply can’t afford the $180 million revenue gap the repeal would cost. Instead the governor in his State of the State address proposed to let low-income Idahoans deduct $90 – up from $20 now – from their state income taxes. Besides Idaho, the states of Hawaii, Kansas, Oklahoma and South Dakota also offer such credits or rebates.
 
Sales taxes on groceries are regressive, meaning they take a larger percentage of the income of poor people than of wealthier people. “A cut in the grocery sales tax is a way to give direct assistance to the poor,” said Sujit CanagaRetna, a budget expert for the Council of State Governments.
 
A $1 billion budget surplus allowed Wyoming last year to temporarily repeal its 4 percent sales tax on food for the next two years, and lawmakers there are considering making the repeal permanent. Utah and South Carolina last year joined five other states that tax groceries at lower rates than other goods, both cutting their sales tax for food by 2 percent. “We saw a mini-trend on this last year,” said Bert Weisan, a fiscal expert for the National Conference of State Legislatures.
 
A more controversial proposal is brewing anew in Mississippi and Tennessee, where some lawmakers last year failed to convince their governors to lower the sales tax on groceries in exchange for hiking the tax on cigarettes. Mississippi and Tennessee have the country’s highest sales taxes on food at 7 percent and 6 percent respectively, and among the lowest taxes on cigarettes, just 18 cents and 20 cents a pack.
 
In Mississippi, a new push for a food tax-cigarette tax swap could provide election fodder for statehouse and gubernatorial races this year. In Tennessee, an alternate swap is being proposed: taxing pornography instead of food.
 
Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) flatly rejected any tax increase last year. “It is irresponsible to cut Mississippi’s budget revenue while we’re trying to recover from Hurricane Katrina,” Barbour said last January when he vetoed the bill.
 
A proposal is in the works this year from Mississippi Lt. Gov. Amy Tuck (R), who led the push in 2006. Tuck has said she does not plan to run for any statewide office this year. “The 20 senators who voted against the grocery sales tax cut will be hearing this on the stump from opponents,” David Hampton, editorial director of The Clarion-Ledger predicted last year.
 
In Tennessee, Gov. Phil Bredesen (D) plans to propose increasing the state’s 20-cents-a-pack cigarette tax. But he recently told The Associated Press that the move would not be linked with a decrease in the state’s 6 percent sales tax on groceries. Bredesen said that he’s "not ideologically opposed" to reducing the food tax, but that he has other spending priorities -- especially in education and health care, the AP reported earlier this month.
 
The solution proposed by Tennessee state Rep. Stacey Campfield (R) is to get rid of the sales tax on food and replace the estimated $450 million a year in revenues with a tax on  pornography. Bredesen called the proposal “constitutionally suspect” but he said he’d be happy to discuss it.

Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org, or e-mail your feedback to our Letters to the editor section at letters@stateline.org.
 
Contact Pamela M. Prah at pprah@stateline.org
 


Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org.

Issues: Economy and Business    Politics    Taxes and Budget    Welfare & Social Policy   

COMMENTS (14)
Most Recent Comments
Have they smoked these FS cigarettes????
By Jan LaRue on Nov 12, 2009 2:04:39 PM

I have scoured every business within a 50 mile radius of home and nobody has the "good" cigarettes left. I can taste the glue they use. I have developed a nasty cough, that I DID NOT have before. Is this just another way to encourage us to quit??? I used to smoke 2-3 packs a day just from the stress of my job. Because of their (not so) brilliant ideas, I am down now to about 1. I can't stand them!! Not to mention the holes that are now burned in my car seats, carpet, coat, and other stuff from having to re-light them dang things so much. I am sure they could have found some other way to make these "safer" without destroying them in the process. They have restricted us from smoking in bars, clubs, resturants, etc. We make the personnal choice to smoke. Guess they are jus tbeing controlling.

Report as Offensive
WE HAVE TO VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE
By Lilli Putian on Oct 23, 2009 9:13:23 PM

The numbers are something like one in five people smoke. So, if we are really going to do something about this, we have to organize to vote these people out of office.

Who voted in your area for this legislation? That's who we are not going to vote for; actually we have to show up and vote against the.

It's the only way we are going to beat this. If we can even get a percentage of one fifth of voters to vote against those who impose these unfair legislations, we will win.

We need to start looking up what legislators that are now in office voted for FSC cigarettes and/or an increase in cigarette taxes. They need to go on a list of people we won't vote for, or in a way that we'll throw off the vote.

Report as Offensive
they won't admit it's in the paper
By Lilli Putian on Sep 24, 2009 7:12:49 PM

I watched Bill Maher the other night, and I thought to myself, what if marijuana was legal and they made it a state law that you had to smoke out of a certain THICK PAPER WITH ADDED GLUE. Well, Bill Maher would have addressed it on his show, especially after all the complaints of an especially nasty cough, headaches, stomach upset, etc, etc.

The truth is Maher did say something in the order of junk food needing to be taxed as cigarettes are, but he fails to mention these state laws that force the smoker to do something that is bad for their health. (AND IT’S ALL LEGAL.)
Why isn’t any one listening to us?
It’s just a cigarette!

What made special interests want us to die from smoking faster?

Why isn’t anyone listening?


Report as Offensive
Cigarette laws
By Pat Janensch on Aug 10, 2009 9:21:03 PM

I smoked for 50 years, my 96 year old mother smoked for 50 years. We never burned anything until the "self extinguishing cigarette" was brought to our state (AZ). Now I have 3 holes in car seats, 2 holes in dining room chairs.
When they go out & I relite the ash falls off. While I now only get to smoke 1/2 the cigarette I end up lighting a new one therefore making me waste more which makes me buy more often.
I'm told by my distributor that this new "self extinguishing cigarette" is on all brands in all states.
Yes, I know I'm not suppose to smoke. I do not smoke around those folks who are allergic to smoke. I don't smoke around children. I discourage young smokers when I see them. I keep paying the add on taxes for cigarettes, I listen to folks complain about smoking, I pay extra for health, home & car insurance because I smoke.
Anyone know where I can purchase the non "self extinguishing cigaretts"???

Report as Offensive
Fire Safety? Why do I now have holes burnt everywhere?
By Pamela Potter on Jun 27, 2009 11:29:13 AM

I have been smoking for over 20 years & now that this "so called" fire safety has been added to my cigarettes; I now have a large hole in my shoe, SEVERAL holes in the seat of my car, one in the carpet in my new bedroom, 2 in the carpet of my car, burns in my shirts & pants etc... Where is this "safety"? When the cigarette starts to go out & you puff on it to re-light it; the hot ashes fall off & burn whatever they come in contact with!! To add to my frustration; my husband laid a cigarette onto his work bench (thinking it would be safe) & it now has an inch & a half burn mark! Why didn't it go out if it's SO SAFE!! What law do we have in place to replace all of my items that have been destroyed buy this NEW LAW!!?? Can't everyone just leave the smokers alone? What about alcohol? I lost my mom & my grandpa to smoking (cancer) but I have lost SEVERAL friends & family members to drunk driving!!! Where is the tax increases & strick laws for alcohol??!! Maybe we should shut down bars since alcohol kills more innocent people than 2nd hand smoke. Watch the news on a Sunday morning sometime & listen to all of the alcohol related deaths or accidents from drinking & driving!!!

Report as Offensive
Read More Comments
FSC
By Judy Dove on Jul 9, 2008 9:06:44 AM

I hate these things! They smell bad, they taste funny and I have developed a horrible cough. On the rare occassions that I can find a carton of the "old" cigarettes the cough completely goes away. I'm finding it hard to believe that some kind of chemical isn't added to the paper. Beside the fact that you re-light constantly, the ash frequently falls off. Why doesn't the consumer have any say in this? You tax us to death, we can't smoke anywhere and now you insult us by giving us crap to smoke. Non-smokers, be aware! Eventually, your rights will be infringed on also.

Report as Offensive
Add NC to that list!
By gigi smith on May 15, 2008 8:16:57 AM

I moved to NC from FLorida and never knew anyone could be taxed on food-Not so in NC!!! That isnt marked on the map here, but it is a "everything" tax state here, EVERYTHING!personal property (ie, Boats, cars), food, State income, everything. I hate it here for only that reason!

Report as Offensive
Sales Tax on Groceries
By Sherry Reid on Apr 15, 2008 1:26:39 PM

I believe it is outrageous to charge a sales tax on necessary food items. We dont charge a sales tax on prescriptions. I have no problem with charging sales tax on food items that are not necessary for life sustaining purposes, like processed snack foods, chips, cookies, soft drinks, bacon, processed sandwich meats, puddings, jellos, refined sugars, sugar substitutes, sugary cereals, alcoholic beverages, any food items that are not considered healthy and nutritious, candy, etc. Other states get by without charging sales tax on food, Mississippi should do what is necessary to follow. Sales tax should be charged thru the nose on all tobacco and luxury items as such. Maybe we would have less tobacco addicted adults. This food tax hits us middle and low income people very hard! That tax money could be spent on more food or gas for our cars so we can get to and from work!

Report as Offensive
food tax
By deidra currie on Sep 23, 2007 9:41:55 PM

i live in atlanta, ga. oddly i recently noticed the following at the foot of my grocery bill from publix (historic west side village location): Subtotal..........33.94
Regular Tax....... 0.00
Food Tax.......... 1.36
Order Total.......35.30

i saw this article when i searched "food tax"...So add GA to the list of scummy places that tax life's necessity for the benefit of whom? I think if the food tax paid for school lunches or something it would be one thing, bu what is that tax doing? who is getting it? who is it benefitting?



Report as Offensive
food tax
By Stanley Wruble on Jun 28, 2007 10:48:19 AM

No matter how you spin it taxes on most food items is a throwback to the very issues which led to the founding of this country. There is one word for it: immoral. Why do some state governments continue to practice this form of taxation? Easy, it is the easy thing to do! But think about it, food is not a luxury or a like-to-have, it is like air.....essential to life. Food for the most part is not discretionary spending for which a tax would be justifiable. The issue of benefiting the wealthy at the cost of the poor is political pap! Even on food stamps the consumer can make his/her food dollar go "X" percent further by elimination of such a wicked tax. Everyone eats, the poor less luxuriously than the wealthy but we all eat. We all pay the tax but that does not make such a tax morally right.

Report as Offensive
Exempting food is the right thing to do...
By Brian Miller on Jun 18, 2007 12:20:56 PM

Economist everywhere agree: The sales tax is a very regressive tax that hits lower- and middle-income families much harder than others. The reason is simple...

Think about what is taxed under a typical state sales tax: Food (many states at least), clothing, furniture, appliances, cars, car parts, bicycles, baby diapers, etc.

Think about what is not taxed under a typical state sales tax: Private school tuition, attorney fees, accounting services, stocks & bonds, real estate investments, etc.

Once you realize what is and isn't taxed with a sales tax, it doesn't take much to see why the sales tax hits low and middle-income families so much harder.

Exempting food is one of the most basic ways to minimizing the inequity that is inherently built into the sales tax.

Report as Offensive
Proposed Constitutional Amendment In Texas
By Vince Leibowitz on Feb 1, 2007 2:07:36 PM

While groceries and certain other items are already exempt from sales tax in Texas, Rep. Hubert Vo (D-Houston) has filed a measure that would add this provision to the state constitution.

Basically, this would protect these items from tax unless the Lege goes back to voters asking them to remove the provision from the constitution (assuming the bill passes).

Report as Offensive
Grocery tax
By Jane Boykin on Jan 29, 2007 8:06:12 PM

Seems like it would be better to take a look at the entire tax structure at once rather than focus on any one tax...We have some strengths - Mississippi doesn't tax poverty level income like some states - and perhaps some weakness - corporate taxes so low that tax credits aren't always meaningful ways to bring about change. Regardless of your position on grocery/tobacco tax, piecemeal policy-making always comes with added risk.

Report as Offensive
States should collect sales tax on groceries
By William Ahern on Jan 29, 2007 4:56:59 PM

The popular sales tax exemption for groceries is a bad idea, just like any special tax break that has to be made up by other taxpayers. Most states have fallen for the deceptively appealing "no food tax" campaign, even though the sales tax exemption for groceries is just another special-interest tax provision that doesn't "help the poor" as the sloganeers claim.

Here's why it doesn't help to exempt groceries:

--Food stamps funnel free food to the poor, so tax exemptions don't help them, and the food stamp program is far more efficient and less corrupt than in former days, mostly because of the switch from the old "stamps" to credit cards.
--The poor eat large amounts of fast food which most states (and localities) double- or triple-tax. This undermines state claims to be granting an exemption for groceries because of their concern for the poor.
--It's really just a sop to the grocers.
--It's horribly complex because in almost every state that grants the exemption, a well organized effort to eliminate it for all "unhealthy" groceries has forced the creation of endless lists of products that either do or don't get the exemption.
--The exemption forces up the rate of the sales tax and other taxes.

--Bill Ahern
Comm. Dir.
Tax Foundation

Report as Offensive
Recession and Recovery
Read the latest news, analysis and research on the economic crisis in the states in Stateline.org's new Recession and Recovery special section.
The Stimulus and the StatesThe Stimulus and the
States

Follow how states are managing the stimulus money and which programs are receiving funding as part of the recovery effort using Stateline.org's stimulus special section.
Stateline Blogs
Stateline.org has compiled an extensive list of state issue political blogs to make it convenient for you to follow state government.

If a blog you find interesting and informative is not on our list, tell us about it by sending an email to editor@stateline.org.
Blogs organized by Issue
lineBlogs organized by State
State Public Policy Resources
Stateline.org has put together a list of state public policy resources organized by issue. Here, you will find useful links to essential information from government, academia, and think tanks. If you have a link to add, please email us.


The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew's Center on the States identifies and advances state policy solutions.