View stories by State
HOME RSS FEEDS ARCHIVES ABOUT US SITE MAP PUBLICATIONS
Search using      Advanced
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
or Browse All States
CRIME & COURTS
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
EDUCATION
ELECTIONS
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
GOVS' SPEECHES
HEALTH CARE
HOMELAND SECURITY
POLITICS
RECESSION & RECOVERY
SOCIAL POLICY
TAXES & BUDGET
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
ARCHIVES
COMMENTARY
PUBLICATIONS
RSS FEEDS
STATE SPEECHES
NEWS ALERTS
PUBLIC POLICY LINKS
TOOLBARS
STATE BLOGS
ISSUE BLOGS


Register to comment on Stateline.org Stories

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Purple states: The playing field expands

Comments Write the editor Print this story

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has long promised to bring the presidential campaign against Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to states that have been Republican bastions — not just to places like Virginia, Nevada and Colorado, considered competitive for well over a year, but also to more unexpected states, like Alaska, North Dakota and Indiana.

Until now, Out There has hesitated to re-label solidly Republican states “purple” — that is, those states that are neither safely Republican (“red”) nor Democratic (“blue”) — simply based on the Obama campaign’s bravado

But after consulting with in-state political observers and the imperfect polling data that is available, Out There is making its biggest expansion of purple states so far in this fourth assessment of state political leanings since mid-2007. The new members of the purple club, accounting for 23 electoral votes, are Indiana, Montana, North Dakota, Alaska and South Dakota.

This expansion aside, an even bigger influence on the presidential race is likely to be changes in the ranking that concern pure tossup states.

As with Out There’s previous assessments, purple states are ranked Likely Democratic, Lean Democratic, Toss-Up, Lean Republican and Likely Republican. Out There currently posits that Obama can claim 241 electoral votes as either safe or leaning in his direction, while Republican John McCain can claim 200 electoral votes for himself.
 

Louis Jacobson is the editor of CongressNow, an online publication launched in 2007 that covers legislation and policy in Congress and is affiliated with Roll Call newspaper in Washington, D.C. Jacobson originated the “Out There” column in 2004 as a feature for Roll Call, where he served as deputy editor. Earlier, Jacobson spent 11 years with National Journal covering lobbying, politics and policy, and served as a contributing writer for two of its affiliates, CongressDaily and Government Executive. He also was a contributing writer to The Almanac of American Politics and has done political handicapping of state legislatures for both The Rothenberg Political Report and The Cook Political Report.
McCain’s total dropped from the 221 he had in Out There’s June 27 assessment, while Obama’s number dropped by one, as the vote for Maine’s 2nd Congressional District shifts from Lean Democratic to Toss-Up. (Unlike every state but Nebraska, Maine gives each of its two U.S. House districts an electoral vote, with two more reserved for the statewide winner.)

But despite this lead, Obama — as national polling suggests — has hardly clinched a victory. Reaching the magical 270 to win the White House will depend on which candidate wins toss-up states that currently account for a combined 96 electoral votes. In addition to five states cited as toss-ups in the June 27 assessment — Colorado, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio and Virginia — Out There has shifted Florida and Nevada from Lean Republican to Toss-Up this time, while nudging Missouri in the other direction, from Toss-Up to Lean Republican.

All three of these switches were close calls, and these states could ping-pong between categories as Election Day nears (as could New Hampshire, currently a Lean Democratic state).

In Missouri, a classic presidential bellwether state for more than a century, Obama has sprinkled rural areas with field offices in an effort to expand on the handful of (admittedly populous) counties he won during his primary victory earlier this year. But rural, white, working-class voters have not been Obama’s strong suit, and a number of recent polls have McCain ahead in the state.

Obama’s fortunes look brighter in Florida and Nevada, where the electorate has more demographic churn, a factor that could reverse these states’ recent preference for Republican presidential candidates.

Battleground states: Republican to Democratic


Current Ranking
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
South Dakota (3 electoral votes): Likely Republican ↓
Alaska (3 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Arkansas (6 electoral votes): Likely Republican

North Dakota (3 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Montana (3 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Indiana (11 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Georgia (15 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Arizona (10 electoral votes): Likely Republican

North Carolina (15 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Missouri (11 electoral votes): Lean Republican

Florida (27 electoral votes): Toss-UP

Nevada (5 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Virginia (13 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Ohio (20 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Colorado (9 electoral votes): Toss-Up

New Mexico (5 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Michigan (17 electoral votes): Toss-Up

New Hampshire (4 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Iowa (7 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Pennsylvania (21 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Maine (4 electoral votes*): Lean Democratic

Minnesota (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Wisconsin (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Oregon (7 electoral votes): Likely Democratic

Washington (11 electoral votes): Likely Democratic



June 2008 Ranking

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
12.
12.
12.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
West Virginia (5 electoral votes): Safely Republican
Arkansas (6 electoral votes): Likely Republican ↑
Georgia (15 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Arizona (10 electoral votes): Likely Republican

North Carolina (15 electoral votes): Likely Republican

Florida (27 electoral votes): Lean Republican

Nevada (5 electoral votes): Lean Republican

Missouri (11 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Virginia (13 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Ohio (20 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Colorado (9 electoral votes): Toss-Up

New Mexico (5 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Michigan (17 electoral votes): Toss-Up

Iowa (7 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

New Hampshire (4 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Pennsylvania (21 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Maine (4 electoral votes*): Lean Democratic

Wisconsin (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Minnesota (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic

Oregon (7 electoral votes): Likely Democratic

Washington (11 electoral votes): Likely Democratic



March 2008 Ranking
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
13.
13.
13.
17.
18.
19.

West Virginia (5 electoral votes): Likely Republican
Arkansas (6 electoral votes): Likely Republican
Florida (27 electoral votes): Lean Republican
Arizona (10 electoral votes): Lean Republican
Nevada (5 electoral votes): Lean Republican
Colorado (9 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Virginia (13 electoral votes):
Missouri (11 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Ohio (20 electoral votes): Toss-Up
New Mexico (5 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Iowa (7 electoral votes): Toss-Up
Pennsylvania (21 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Maine (4 electoral votes*): Lean Democratic
Wisconsin (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Michigan (17 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Minnesota (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
Oregon (7 electoral votes): LeanDemocratic
New Hampshire (4 electoral votes): Likely Democratic
Washington (11 electoral votes): Likely Democratic



July 2007 Ranking
  1. Virginia (13 electoral votes): Likely Republican
  2. Nevada (5 electoral votes): Likely Republican
  3. Florida (27 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  4. Arizona (10 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  5. West Virginia (5 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  6. Colorado (9 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  7. Arkansas (6 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  8. Missouri (11 electoral votes): Lean Republican
  9. Ohio (20 electoral votes): Toss-Up
  10. New Mexico (5 electoral votes): Toss-Up
  11. Iowa (7 electoral votes): Toss-Up
  12. Wisconsin (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
  13. Minnesota (10 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
  14. Michigan (17 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
  15. Maine (4 electoral votes*): Lean Democratic
  16. Pennsylvania (21 electoral votes): Lean Democratic
  17. Oregon (7 electoral votes): Likely Democratic
  18. New Hampshire (4 electoral votes): Likely Democratic
  19. Washington (11 electoral votes): Likely Democratic
*Maine allocates electoral votes in part by Congressional district.
Editor's note: This chart has been amended to provide the correct number of electoral votes for Indiana, which is 11.
In Florida, Obama has closed the gap where he looked weak during much of the first half this year. While the Illinois senator still has to worry about soft support among older voters, a late-July Quinnipiac poll had Obama up, 46 percent-44 percent. Other polls have McCain leading within the margin of error.

Meanwhile, in Nevada, recent polls have shown the race to be tight, but Democrats are increasingly buoyed by Democratic registration gains.

Out There currently classifies 25 states as purple, although some of these states are more competitive than others. Because the five newcomers to the purple list are only shifting from the Safe Republican category to Likely Republican, they do not change the electoral vote balance just yet. Still, it is now conceivable that these states could vote for Obama this fall.

While frustration with President Bush is real even in these Republican bastions, the new competitiveness stems in large part from the Obama campaign’s success in raising money. This has enabled the campaign to open offices and run advertising in a wider variety of states than anyone had expected just six months ago. And as a result, these states have moved away from Safe Republican status.

In Montana and North Dakota especially — where Obama has gone out of his way to visit — sources report continued excitement among rank-and-file Democrats, mixed with a lack of enthusiasm among Republicans for McCain. Automated polls show the race close in these states, with Obama sometimes ahead.

 “The Obama team has pledged to hire 50 field organizers in the state,” North Dakota state Sen. Tracy Potter (D) said. “In my 40 years in politics here, I don't think there have ever been more than 20, maybe never more than a dozen, paid staff working for the whole combined Democratic Party and its slate of candidates.”

South Dakota remains a longer shot for Obama, in part because it, unlike Montana and North Dakota, was not included in Obama’s early round of ad buys. But it is geographically and demographically similar to its neighbors, and scattered polls have showed McCain ahead only modestly.

Meanwhile, Obama has also put staff on the ground and aired advertising in Alaska. A recent poll there by a Democratic firm had Obama up by five points, though independent polls show McCain ahead. Obama has an opening in Alaska, not just because of the GOP corruption scandal that recently ensnared U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens (R), but also because McCain, despite his pro-drilling rhetoric message this summer, has long been opposed to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve — a stance at odds with many Alaskans

The other new purple state, Indiana, is the only one outside the West. Obama has established almost two dozen offices in the state and put television ads into heavy rotation.

Democrats predict a strong counterattack by the GOP and its allies, such as those in the gun movement, as the fall contest nears its climax. “I expect that ultimately, those voters indifferent to McCain are going to hold their nose and vote for him,” said Chuck Denowh, a former Montana Republican Party executive director.

Still, the good news for Obama is that he may not need to win a single one of these new purple states. If Obama can hold to all the states that are currently leaning in his direction, he could claim the presidency simply by winning the three Toss-Up states closest to his grasp: Michigan, New Mexico and Colorado. And if he did that, he could afford to lose Ohio and Florida and still become president.

See Related Stories:
State by state, it's still a tight race (6/27/2008)
Purple' states turn a little more 'blue' (3/6/2008)
2008 may come down to Ohio — again (7/19/2007)



Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org.

COMMENTS (0)
There are no comments yet, would you like to add one?

The seventh annual Hal Hovey Award was presented Feb. 3 to Marc Perrusquia, an enterprise and investigative reporter for The Commercial Appeal, the daily newspaper in Memphis Tenn. The award is made jointly by Stateline.org, which is part of the Pew Center on the States, and Governing Magazine for outstanding coverage of state and local government.
Recession and Recovery
Read the latest news, analysis and research on the economic crisis in the states in Stateline.org's new Recession and Recovery special section.
The Stimulus and the StatesThe Stimulus and the
States

Follow how states are managing the stimulus money and which programs are receiving funding as part of the recovery effort using Stateline.org's stimulus special section.
Stateline Blogs
Stateline.org has compiled an extensive list of state issue political blogs to make it convenient for you to follow state government.

If a blog you find interesting and informative is not on our list, tell us about it by sending an email to editor@stateline.org.
Blogs organized by Issue
lineBlogs organized by State
State Public Policy Resources
Stateline.org has put together a list of state public policy resources organized by issue. Here, you will find useful links to essential information from government, academia, and think tanks. If you have a link to add, please email us.


The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew's Center on the States identifies and advances state policy solutions.