View stories by State
HOME RSS FEEDS ARCHIVES ABOUT US SITE MAP PUBLICATIONS
Search using      Advanced
Saturday, November 21, 2009
or Browse All States
CRIME & COURTS
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
EDUCATION
ELECTIONS
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
GOVS' SPEECHES
HEALTH CARE
HOMELAND SECURITY
POLITICS
RECESSION & RECOVERY
SOCIAL POLICY
TAXES & BUDGET
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
ARCHIVES
COMMENTARY
PUBLICATIONS
RSS FEEDS
STATE SPEECHES
NEWS ALERTS
PUBLIC POLICY LINKS
TOOLBARS
STATE BLOGS
ISSUE BLOGS


Register to comment on Stateline.org Stories

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Gay marriage legal in six states

Comments Write the editor Print this story

View state policies by or
(Updated 4:40 p.m. EDT, June 4, 2009)

Until 2004, same-sex couples couldn’t wed anywhere in the country. Now, gay marriage is legal in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, Maine and most recently New Hampshire. 

Despite these historic strides by the gay rights movement, though, the United States is still a nation divided over whether to redefine marriage.

The California Supreme Court on May 26 upheld the state’s voter-approved constitutional ban on gay marriage, but ruled that some 18,000 same-sex couples who wed before Proposition 8 took effect would still be married under state law. 

Twenty-nine other states have enshrined voter-approved prohibitions blocking same-sex marriage in their state constitution as a way to keep state judges from overturning the bans.

In polls, a majority of Americans still oppose full marriage rights for same-sex couples, though the margins are narrowing.

The Northeast is growing as a stronghold of government recognition of same-sex relationships, with legal wedlock in five states -- including Vermont as of Sept. 1, 2009, and Maine as of Sept. 16, if the law is not suspended because of a voter movement to repeal it, and New Hampshire as of Jan. 1, 2010.  In the same region, Maine, Connecticut, New Jersey and the District of Columbia also offer legal alternatives known as civil unions and domestic partnerships. New York and Rhode Island recognize out-of-state marriages of gay partners.

On the West Coast, California, Oregon and Washington offer same-sex couples all state-level marriage benefits under domestic partnerships laws. Nevada and Hawaii have domestic partnership laws that offer some, but not all marriage benefits.

Iowa is the first heartland state to recognize gay marriage, effective April 24, 2009, following a unanimous state Supreme Court decision April 3.

  SAME-SEX MARRIAGE HIISTORY
Thirty-six states have statutes on the books prohibiting gay marriage, including some that also have constitutional bans. Only three states – New York, Rhode Island and New Mexico – have taken no action in either direction.

Further change is possible in 2009. In April 2009, New York Gov. David Paterson (D) proposed a bill to legalize gay marriage, following his 2008 decision that the state would recognize same-sex marriages performed out-of-state.  In New Jersey and the District of Columbia, prominent lawmakers support moving from marriage alternatives to full marriage rights.

In 1996, then-President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) , codifying states’ rights to decide whether to allow or ban same-sex marriage and defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman for federal purposes, such as claiming tax breaks for spouses and receiving deceased partners’ Social Security benefits. The law also spelled out a state’s right to refuse to recognize gay marriages performed in other states.

During George W. Bush’s presidency, Congress tried twice but failed to muster the necessary votes to amend the U.S. Constitution to prohibit gay marriage. President Barack Obama and many in Congress have staked out a middle ground on the issue, recommending states adopt marriage alternatives, but so far, no one on Capitol Hill has proposed a change in federal marriage laws.

Congressional attitudes toward gay marriage could be tested, however, by a District of Columbia plan to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages. Congress must approve all bills affecting the U.S. capital city. D.C. also may consider a measure to legalize same-sex marriage.

In this 50-state rundown, Stateline.org maps the state of play in all 50 states, including landmark court decisions, voter referendums, state legislation and federal and international laws.

History of state bans

Massachusetts’ historic 2003 high court ruling finding it unconstitutional to deny same-sex couples the right to marry touched off the current political frenzy over the issue. But the first leap toward recognizing gay marriage rights came in 1993, when Hawaii’s Supreme Court sided with a same-sex couple.

Rather than risk a high court order to recognize gay marriages, Hawaiian voters in 1998 rewrote their state constitution to give lawmakers, not the courts, the right to define marriage, and lawmakers subsequently voted to prohibit gay nuptials. 

The Hawaii case sparked action in Congress, resulting in then-President Bill Clinton signing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996.

Three states soon adopted constitutional marriage bans: Alaska (1998), Nebraska (2000) and Nevada (2000). And 42 states enacted statutes similar to the federal DOMA, although three of those laws have since been overturned.

After Massachusetts’ 2003 court ruling, statutory bans were seen as providing limited protection because judges could throw out the laws if they violated state constitutional rights. As a result, voters in 13 states in 2004 rushed to rewrite their constitutions to limit marriage to heterosexuals. Two more states passed constitutional bans on gay marriage in 2005 and eight more in 2006. Arizona in 2006 became the first and only state to reject a ballot initiative to ban same-sex marriage, but voted in favor of a ban in 2008. California and Florida approved constitutional bans in 2008.

Court decisions and pending cases

As with many U.S. civil rights issues, courts have held the keys to marriage rights for homosexual couples. Only Vermont has enacted a statute legalizing same-sex matrimony, although California lawmakers in 2005 and 2006 passed bills that Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed.

Iowa’s court decision in April 2009 mirrors those in Massachusetts (2003), California (2008) and Connecticut (2008), which ruled marriage between two people of the same sex was a guaranteed civil right. 

But high courts in Maryland (2007), New York (2006) and Washington state (2006) have taken the opposite position, ruling against gay couples’ claims that matrimony is a state right. Two other courts, New Jersey (2006) and Vermont (1999), ruled that same-sex couples have the right to the benefits of marriage, but not the title.

Pending, is a federal court case filed in Massachusetts in March 2009, seeking federal marriage rights – including the marriage tax break and Social Security benefits – for couples who wed in states that allow it.  Also pending is a federal case filed in San Francisco in May 2009, seeking to overturn California’s Proposition 8 under equal rights protections in the U.S. Constitution.

Where same-sex marriage is legal

Street celebrations marked the first same-sex weddings when Massachusetts began performing gay nuptials on May 17, 2004. On Feb. 10, 2004, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsome began performing same-sex marriages, and officials in Sandoval County, N.M., and New Paltz, N.Y., followed his lead – although courts later ruled those marriages invalid.

On June 16, 2008, California began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, following a May 15, 2008, high court decision. According to the University of California Los Angeles Law School, about 18,000 couples married before the decision was struck down by voters on Election Day 2008, and the state’s high court has ruled their marriages are valid.

Connecticut began granting marriage certificates to spouses of the same gender Nov. 12, 2008, under an Oct.10, 2008, court decision. Iowa’s high court ruled in favor of same-sex marriages April 3, 2009, and marriages were performed starting April 24. 

Overriding a veto by Republican Gov. Jim Douglas, the Democratic-controlled Vermont Legislature legalized gay marriage in April 2009, and wedding licenses were slated to be issued starting Sept. 1, 2009.

On May 6, 2009, Maine Gov. John Baldacci (D) became the first governor to sign a gay marriage law without a court order compelling him to do so. Marriages will begin on or about Sept. 16, unless a voter movement to repeal the new law gathers enough signatures by Sept. 15 to put the issue on the ballot.

On June 3, 2009, New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch (D), signed a bill legalizing gay marriage and a separate bill providing legal protections for religious organizations and their employees who choose not to participate in such weddings. Marriages will begin Jan. 1, 2010.

In addition, New York’s Paterson ruled in 2008 that his state would recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch in 2007 advised the state to honor gay marriages performed elsewhere. The District of Columbia city council also voted April 7 to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere.

Federal gay marriage policies

President Obama has said he believes that "marriage is between a man and a woman," but he voted against a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage as a U.S. senator, saying the decision should be left up to states. He said he encourages states to adopt marriage alternatives such as civil unions and domestic partnerships.

Congress tried twice – in 2004 and 2006 – but in spite of support by President Bush, the measures failed to muster the two-thirds support needed for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage nationwide.

Public opinion

Meanwhile, the number of same-sex couples with marriage licenses grows. At least 18,000 couples seized a brief opportunity to marry in California in 2008, more than 12,000 have tied the knot in Massachusetts and several thousand in Connecticut.

Political and legal experts say the growing number of same-sex couples in the country will create social and ultimately political pressure toward greater liberalization of state marriage laws. New legal challenges will emerge as married same-sex couples return or relocate to states that do not recognize marriage rights.

But voters’ rejection of gay marriage in California – a social trendsetter and home to hundreds of thousands of gay couples – drove home the shortcomings in public support. While most Americans support marriage alternatives such as civil unions, a majority oppose use of the title, according to recent polls.

Forty-nine percent of Americans oppose same-sex marriage while 38 percent approve of it, according to a May 2008 national poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, which like Stateline.org is supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts. The results show a softening of attitudes toward gay marriage since a July 2004 poll by the Pew Research Center in which 56 percent opposed and 32 percent supported legal matrimony by gays and lesbians.

Civil unions and domestic partnerships

Gay couples have gained greater acceptance in eight states with marriage alternatives, including domestic partnerships and civil unions: California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington state. Now that marriage is legal in Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont, civil union laws are being phased out and couples in civil unions are being converted to marriage.

First enacted by Hawaii in 1997, domestic partnerships vary in the number of benefits and responsibilities they bestow. Hawaii’s law is limited, as are laws in Maine (2004) and Nevada (2009). But California (1999), Oregon (2007) and Washington state (2009) give gay couples all of the legal rights enjoyed by heterosexual couples, including tax breaks, rights to hospital visits, approval of organ donations and inheritance without a will.

In 2000, Vermont became the first state to create an institution just short of marriage called civil unions after the state’s high court ruled gay couples must have all the rights of marriage, but not necessarily the title. In 2005, Connecticut became the first state to adopt civil unions without a court order. Also under high court orders, New Jersey adopted a civil union law in 2006, and New Hampshire adopted one in 2007. 

International laws

Outside the United States, same-sex marriage is slowly gaining ground. The Netherlands legalized gay marriage in 2001, followed by Belgium and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and British Columbia in 2003; Quebec, Canada, in 2004; Spain and all other Canadian provinces in 2005; South Africa in 2006; and Norway in June 2008. Sweden was scheduled to begin performing same-sex marriages May 1, 2009.

See Related Stories:

3 states, including Calif., ban gay marriage (11/5/2008)
Calif. gay marriage ruling sparks new debate (5/16/2008)
States at odds over gay marriage recognition (6/12/2008)
Gay marriage decisions ripe in Calif., Conn.  (3/1/2007)
50-state rundown on gay marriage laws (11/3/2004)
Same-Sex Couples Seek Marriage Rights (12/19/2002)

Contact Christine Vestal at cvestal@stateline.org.



Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org.

Topics: Crime and Courts   

COMMENTS (7)
Most Recent Comments
Same Sex Marriage
By Gideon Korte on Oct 18, 2009 8:33:27 PM

To tell the truth, this whole thing is absolutely ridiculous. Same-sex marriage, two people love each other enough to want to get married, they should be able to get married, it is our right to get married, why should homosexuals get left out of this?

In the Declaration of Independence, Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of happiness was part of it. Shouldn't this be followed?

In the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, part 1, it says "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" That is exactly what states are doing by denying same-sex couples the right to marry.

Report as Offensive
Same sex marriage
By Mirtha Morales on Jul 8, 2009 7:15:49 PM

To tell you the thruth Im a firm believer of the saying "live and let live," but at the same time I believe God gave us a way through His word, and it is through His word ( The Holy Bible)Jesus said: (Genesis 1:27,28:) 27- God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He Him; male and female created he them. 28-And God blessed them and God said unto them "be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth, and subdue it; and have children. Forgive me but unless there's a way into which a man can be "fruitful and multiply with another one of the same sex, or the product of their own dominion, there's absolubtly something wrong with thus picture.
We are although a little peculiar sometimes!, a product of our own enviroment and by the way; there's no way you can please everybody is for that reason that I agree with a person pleasing their own and try to live within the guidelines of what your commonwealth is offering you as a way of living.
The civil Union is the newer type of relationship, created specifically to answer homosexual couples'demand for rights equivalent to those of married heterosexuals,2000.The only difference between the two is that the latter is restricted to male-female couples which have the same rights and obligations as those who are married.

Report as Offensive
Gay Marriage
By hank mcarthy on Apr 29, 2009 7:59:41 PM

For me the sexuality between a man and man is sexual perversion. It's abhorent that this act should even be considered under a civil rights situation. I lump this type of sexual deviance in with beastality and incest. I can only hope other states will come to their senses and stop the insanity.
Denying male/female adoptions so gay marriage can have the kids is crazy. Kids should be parented by hetro couples
when ever possible it's the only truely normal way. The promotion of 2 prince books,and homosexuality only helps push sexual immorality on the next generation. This can only lead to more cases of aids and greater harm done to the person mental and spiritual being due to the practice of homosexuality.

Report as Offensive
gay marriage
By katelyn everett on Apr 28, 2009 12:26:17 PM

ok, listen here. i'm fed up with everyone getting on gay people's backs. i am straight; but my sister is gay. i know the difficulties they go through. they constantly judge "them" for what gender they like. and "they" constantly get made fun of for their lifestyle. it's not a decision; so you can't say, "it's their decision." it's feelings. and whethere they do or do not feel what you feel, they shouldn't be made fun of or judged for that. their lives have absolutely nothing to do with your life. they are not harming you in any way--and people incourage everyone to be "different" and "live your own lives". then how come when people try to live their own lives and be different, they can't even do it without being made fun of or constantly harrassed. i think gay marriage should be perfectly fine in the u.s; banning gay marriage is causing more controversy than if it was legal. as l ong as someone found love; whether it's a boy and boy, girl and boy, or girl and girl, it's still love. and people shouldn't judge someone for who they love. stay out of other people's business cause they ain't bothering no one.

Report as Offensive
gay marriage
By amber mayne on Apr 27, 2009 4:45:39 AM

I THINK GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE OK IN ALL STATES WE DONT SAY NOTHING ABOUT STRAIGHT PEOPLE BEING MARRIED SO WHY DO THEY HAVE SOMETHING WITH GAYS WONTING TO BE MARRIED AS LONG AS THEY ARE HAPPY IT SHOULD BE OK WE ARE NOT HURTTING NO ONE JUST LIKE STRAIGHT'S ARE NOT HURTING NO ONE JUST BECAUSE STRAIGHTS DONT LIKE SAME SEXT MARRIAGE THEY DONT NEED TO PUNISH GAYS FOR IT WE DID NOT DO ANY THING TO THEM WE DONT SAY NOTHING ABOUT THER LIFES AND THEY SHULD NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT ARES JUST BECAU THEY DONT LIKE IT DONT MEANY ANY THING.

Report as Offensive
Read More Comments
The Truth about what is defined as "Marriage" for the uneducated
By Joseph Pepitone on Nov 12, 2008 8:09:34 AM

Egalitarianism is a political doctrine that holds that all people should be treated as equals and have the same political, economic, social, and civil rights. Generally it applies to being held equal under the law and society at large.


Equality commonly refers to the idea of equal treatment. Equality before the law or equality under the law or legal egalitarianism is the principle under which each individual is subject to the same laws, with no individual or group having special legal privileges, or denied legal privledges enjoyed by other individuals or groups.


Marriage is a social, spiritual, or legal union of individuals. This union may also be called matrimony, while the ceremony that marks its beginning is usually called a wedding and the married status created is sometimes called wedlock.


Marriage is an institution in which interpersonal relationships (usually intimate and sexual) are acknowledged by the state . It is often viewed as a contract. Civil marriage is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction. If recognized by the state, or by society in general, the act of marriage changes the personal and social status of the individuals who enter into it.


People marry for many reasons, but usually one or more of the following: legal, social, and economic stability; the formation of a family unit; the education and nurturing of children; legitimizing sexual relations; public declaration of love; or to obtain citizenship.


A marriage is often formalized during a marriage ceremony, which may be performed either by a religious officiant, by a secular State authorised officiator, or (in weddings that have no church or state affiliation) by a trusted friend of the wedding participants. The act of marriage usually creates normative or legal obligations between the individuals involved and, in many societies, their extended families.


The right of same sex couples to marry is a human right, having no reason to even be voted upon, one group of people cannot be allowed to decide the fate of another.
On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that "Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
"

Nowhere does Article 16 of the Universal Declartation of Human Rights indicate that men and women of full age cannot marry the same sex.


Social equality is a social state of affairs in which all people within a specific society or isolated group have the same status in a certain respect. At the very least, social equality includes equal rights under the law, such as security, voting rights, freedom of speech and assembly, and the extent of property rights. However, it also includes access to education, health care and other social securities. It also includes equal opportunities and obligations, and so involves the whole society.


It is time for us and those that love us to stand united and demand the rights granted us by the United Nations and the World
















Report as Offensive
should allow gay marriage
By michelle saucier on Nov 7, 2008 11:02:39 AM

why do people not let gays live there life when gays let sraights live here lifes and do not abant sraight marriage everybody should be abal to marrie who ever they want to as long as there happy

Report as Offensive
Recession and Recovery
Read the latest news, analysis and research on the economic crisis in the states in Stateline.org's new Recession and Recovery special section.
The Stimulus and the StatesThe Stimulus and the
States

Follow how states are managing the stimulus money and which programs are receiving funding as part of the recovery effort using Stateline.org's stimulus special section.
Stateline Blogs
Stateline.org has compiled an extensive list of state issue political blogs to make it convenient for you to follow state government.

If a blog you find interesting and informative is not on our list, tell us about it by sending an email to editor@stateline.org.
Blogs organized by Issue
lineBlogs organized by State
State Public Policy Resources
Stateline.org has put together a list of state public policy resources organized by issue. Here, you will find useful links to essential information from government, academia, and think tanks. If you have a link to add, please email us.


The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew's Center on the States identifies and advances state policy solutions.