View stories by State
HOME RSS FEEDS ARCHIVES ABOUT US SITE MAP PUBLICATIONS
Search using      Advanced
Saturday, November 21, 2009
or Browse All States
CRIME & COURTS
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
EDUCATION
ELECTIONS
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
GOVS' SPEECHES
HEALTH CARE
HOMELAND SECURITY
POLITICS
RECESSION & RECOVERY
SOCIAL POLICY
TAXES & BUDGET
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
ARCHIVES
COMMENTARY
PUBLICATIONS
RSS FEEDS
STATE SPEECHES
NEWS ALERTS
PUBLIC POLICY LINKS
TOOLBARS
STATE BLOGS
ISSUE BLOGS


Register to comment on Stateline.org Stories

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

States eye stem cell research economics

Comments Write the editor Print this story

Public funding for embryonic stem cell research -- still restricted at the federal level -- is expected to top several state legislative agendas this year, promoted by governors on both sides of the aisle in the name of economic progress and job creation. 
 
Govs. Matt Blunt (R) of Missouri, Jim Doyle (D) of Wisconsin, Rod Blagojevich (D) of Illinois, Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) of Maryland and Gov.-elect Jon Corzine (D) of New Jersey, among others, are expected to push for legislation that would support the nascent science, despite likely opposition from legislators and activists.
 
“We saw a dramatic change in the level of interest in state funding of embryonic stem cell research last year, and we expect the momentum to continue this year,” said Alissa Johnson of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
 
Still, despite intense legislative activity, industry lobbyists say they don’t expect many laws to pass this year, because the complex and controversial issue will require more time to resolve than most politicians can be expected to commit in a busy election year.

Critics of the research -- which can involve the destruction of human embryos -- object on ethical grounds because they consider an embryo to be a human being. Meanwhile, proponents argue that the state has a moral imperative to support the developing field because it promises to save lives. Supporters also predict that the new scientific technique will spawn a lucrative new branch of medical research.
  
One particularly divisive battle is likely to persist in Missouri, where voters may consider a well-funded ballot initiative calling for a constitutional amendment protecting the rights of scientists to conduct the research and patients to receive resulting treatments. 
 
Last year, Blunt -- a pro-life conservative -- vetoed a measure pushed by conservative legislators that would have made involvement in the science a felony.  Later in the year, concerned his state would lose high-paying research jobs, Blunt saw his worries come true when Blagojevich, his neighbor across the Mississippi River, mounted a letter-writing campaign to lure Missouri’s top scientists to his state.
 
Earlier in the year Blagojevich, eager to secure his state’s high-tech future, bypassed the Statehouse and directed the Illinois Department of Public Health to award $10 million in grants to stem cell research facilities in the state. Blagojevich is expected to continue his campaign in support of the science, possibly seeking legislative solutions.

In another contentious battle, Wisconsin's Doyle, who last year vetoed a bill that would have prohibited embryonic stem cell research in the state that pioneered the science, is likely to seek legislative support for his proposal to provide $750 million in public and private funds to support a stem cell research institute on the campus of the University of Wisconsin, where the science was pioneered. 
 
Maryland, which currently has no stem cell research laws on the books, is scheduled to take up the issue after shelving it at the end of last year.  Ehrlich, who is running for re-election, supports funding for research facilities but has not committed state funds to paying for the research. 
 
Meanwhile rival Democrats who have announced plans to run against Ehrlich favor state funding for research, and  recent polls indicate a broad majority of Marylanders support state funding. A major economic goal in Maryland is to expand its budding biotechnology research business.
 
At year’s end, New Jersey became the only state to award public funds for stem cell research, disbursing $5 million in grants to research institutions in the state. But this month, when acting Gov. Richard J. Codey (D) sought legislative approval for another $580 million in revenue and loans for the research before his term ended, the bill foundered.
 
The newly elected governor, Corzine, who announced his commitment to the science during his campaign, is expected to craft his own proposals for funding the research, which is seen as a lynchpin to reviving New Jersey’s flagging research industry.
 
California’s $3 billion stem cell research funding program -- the most ambitious in the country -- continued to be sidelined by lawsuits and bureaucratic wrangling at year’s end, but state officials were optimistic that the program would move forward this year. 
 
Last year, Massachusetts, Illinois and Connecticut joined California and New Jersey in supporting the science, with no restrictions. Massachusetts was the only state to pass a law supporting the research, without providing funding. This year, Massachusetts -- home to Harvard University, an international leader in the field -- is expected to pass a law committing state funds to the science.
 
On the other side of the issue, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) has voiced strong opposition to the research and can expect a battle with legislators who have proposed a bill committing $15 million a year for 10 years to embryonic stem cell research. If legislative initiatives are not successful, stem cell research advocates in the state have proposed a constitutional amendment that would appropriate $20 million annually for 10 years. 
 
In 2005, Indiana joined five other states -- Arkansas, Iowa, Michigan, North Dakota and South Dakota -- in banning human cloning for any purpose, including research. Laws in 25 states place some restriction on the research, although South Dakota is the only state that bans it altogether.
 
While recent national and state public opinion polls indicate that a clear majority of voters favor public support for the promising new research, religious and ethical concerns are expected to continue to plague 2006 gubernatorial and legislative attempts to pass embryonic stem cell funding bills.
 
The research, which raises ethical issues about the beginnings of life similar to those expressed by anti-abortion activists, has divided the Republican Party.  Religious conservatives in many states oppose all forms of embryonic stem cell research, while some anti-abortion Republican politicians support the science for its life-saving potential and economic promise.
 
The science, which originated at the University of Wisconsin in 1998, uses human embryos to create undifferentiated cells that have the potential to become any cell in the human body.  As a result, scientists predict that embryonic stem cell studies will some day result in cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, diabetes and Alzheimer’s and in cell replacement therapies to repair brain and spinal cord damage, among other conditions.
 
In August 2001, President Bush announced a ban on federal funding of all forms of embryonic cell research except studies using previously created cell lines. Congress will consider a bill this year that would lift those restrictions.
 
The scandal surrounding South Korean stem cell researcher Hwang Woo Suk, who in December admitted that he had faked results in his widely acclaimed therapeutic cloning study, quickly became fuel for detractors of the science.
 
But a subsequent discovery at the University of Wisconsin indicating that cloned cells could successfully be transplanted into humans has fueled optimism among the science's supporters.  

 

Send your comments on this story to letter@stateline.org. Selected reader feedback will be posted in the Letters to the Editor section.

Contact Christine Vestal at
cvestal@stateline.org.


Comment on this story in the space below by registering with Stateline.org.

Issues: Economy and Business    Politics    Health Care    Elections    Technology    Welfare & Social Policy   

COMMENTS (0)
There are no comments yet, would you like to add one?
Recession and Recovery
Read the latest news, analysis and research on the economic crisis in the states in Stateline.org's new Recession and Recovery special section.
The Stimulus and the StatesThe Stimulus and the
States

Follow how states are managing the stimulus money and which programs are receiving funding as part of the recovery effort using Stateline.org's stimulus special section.
Stateline Blogs
Stateline.org has compiled an extensive list of state issue political blogs to make it convenient for you to follow state government.

If a blog you find interesting and informative is not on our list, tell us about it by sending an email to editor@stateline.org.
Blogs organized by Issue
lineBlogs organized by State
State Public Policy Resources
Stateline.org has put together a list of state public policy resources organized by issue. Here, you will find useful links to essential information from government, academia, and think tanks. If you have a link to add, please email us.


The Pew Charitable Trusts applies the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew's Center on the States identifies and advances state policy solutions.